When it comes to the successful deployment of a robotic system for your application, less variation in the process usually translates to a substantially higher probability for success. This especially holds true when machine vision systems are employed. Vision systems often require controlled lighting and lensing with repeatable target presentation to effectively perform the task they’ve been selected for, such as measuring, counting, or inspecting. End effectors, or end-of-arm robotic tooling, may often rely on a repeatable presentation of their subject in order to correctly manipulate it. In this article from MIT Technology Review, a contest sponsored by Amazon is profiled that seeks to push the boundaries of machine vision and robotic manipulators in order to better function in their fulfillment centers. The engineers at Intellimech are highly skilled at engineering and integrating the latest vision systems and customized end-of-arm tooling for your specific application to help you capture success.
Robots Are Really Picking Up
End-of-arm robotic tooling, also known as an end effector, is used to enable your robotic system to interact with its environment. In pick-and-place applications, a commonly used technique is the use of vacuum on the end effector to positively capture a product. When the product or its packaging won’t lend itself to the use of suction, mechanical methods may be implemented to achieve the desired result. Our engineers at Intellimech are experts in robotic systems and finding either commercially-available end effectors or integrating a custom solution for any application. In this article from MIT Technology Review, a new device that makes use of electrostatic attraction to interact with products is introduced.
Safety Standards and Operator-Machine Collaboration
An important part of the machine design process is performing a hazard identification and risk assessment in order to help engineer the most effective solution. International standards have been developed, including ISO 12100 and ANSI B11.0, that outline the methodology for implementing these steps in the development of a machine. Typically, a quantitative method that assigns numeric values to the implications of a machine’s hazard is used to determine appropriate safeguarding methods. In this article from MIT Technology Review, the challenges involved with closer, more frequent collaboration between operators and automated equipment are explored and the associated potential for injury. Intellimech’s engineers have substantial experience in performing standards-based risk assessments and applying both cutting-edge and well-established methods for safeguarding to maximize a solution’s effectiveness and operator safety.
Improving Machine Usability and Operator Safety
Traditionally, machine safety guidelines have prohibited most operator access to moving equipment, especially when that equipment is under automatic control. All that may change though, now that advanced safety technologies like PLCs, laser scanners, vision systems, and I/O systems are becoming faster, more responsive, and more capable. These devices can help facilitate greater interaction between human operators and automated equipment and processes while still maintaining an exceptional level of safety. In this article from MIT Technology Review, the possibilities of close collaboration between operators and equipment is explored.